- Ostensibly is a disarmament conference
- Wilsonian notion - "Cosus belli"
- After WWI, there is a naval arms race between the British and the US
- US has become a naval power during WWI and by 1918, we reach parity with the British
- Facilitated by Teddy's acquisition of the Panama Canal
- We can now be a two ocean power
- Also the Spanish American War, the acquisition of Hawaii, and the open door in China projected US power into Pacific
- US presence in Pacific has brought US into conflict with Japan, augmented by the Anglo-Japanese Alliance of 1902 (20 years)
- British naval policy in the 19th and into the 20th century is to be 110% of the 2nd and 3rd greatest naval powers
- High Seas Fleet concept is being repeated by the US
- Brits are engaged in an expensive naval arms race with the US at a time when they are deeply in debt
- Brits and their growing labor party also want to increase the welfare state
- Japan wishes to secure their position in Asia
- US
- Republican administration (Harding) and Charles Evans Hughes/Henry Cabot Lodge/Elihu Root
- Lower taxes and a trend in the US back towards isolationism
- US also foresees a war with Japan, which is complicated by the Anglo-Japanese Alliance
- US goals
- End the Anglo-Japanese Alliance (without telling Japan) in 1922
- Favorable naval ratio with Japan
- Reaffirmation of the open door policy (free trade) in China
- Ishii-Lansing with Japan
- US is willing to accept naval parity with Britain if they dump Japan
- GB
- British goals
- Concerns over Japanese expansion in China during WWI and also concerned with the US expansion of its specific fleet
- Balance of power/status quo
- End arms race with SU and accept naval parity
- Protect their spheres of influence in central China from Japanese expansion
- Protect the interests of the dominions in the region (India, Australia, and New Zealand) and their key possessions of Hong Kong and Singapore
- Japan
- Concerns with equal treatment (denial of racism with League)
- Japanese goals
- Acceptable naval ratios with British and US
- Recognition of their sphere in Manchuria and Mongolia (21 demands)
- Shantung peninsula from Germany confirmed (negotiable)
- US hosts this conference and, through espionage, the US has cracked the Japanese diplomatic code
- US knows what Japan will accept as terms
- Three treaties
- 4 power, 5 power, and 9 power treaties
- 4 Power
- US, GB, Japan, and France agree to territorial status quo
- Shantung goes back to China
- 9 Power
- A mutual affirmation of open door in China
- 4 + Italy, Belgium, Dutch, Portugal, and China
- 5 Power
- Naval arms
- 5:5:3:1.7:1.7
- GB:US:Japan:Italy:France
- GB and US have at least two ocean navies, and Japan just a single ocean navy
- These limitations primarily focus on battleships
- Total tonnage limits - 525,000 tons and an individual maximum of 35,000 tons
- Result for US
- Decommission 15 battleships (old) and two news ones
- Also stop construction on 13 more
- Also a similar agreement on aircraft carriers (135,000 tons)
- GB, US and Japan also agree on submarine parity with tonnage limit
- US and Brits are in naval (and later world view) accord
Hey guys its Frances! I graduated from Grimsley in 2016 and I'm not posting new notes anymore, but I hope this helps some of you out! Good luck in high school. Just know that it eventually does pay off, I promise! Stay golden :)
Wednesday, January 6, 2016
Washington Naval Conference (1921)
Washington Naval Conference (1921)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment